RESUMEN
High rates of co-occurring depression are commonly reported in youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), especially in individuals without intellectual disability (ID). Depression in ASD undermines adaptive behavior and is associated with a higher risk of suicidality. Females with ASD may be particularly vulnerable due to their greater use of camouflaging strategies. Indeed, in comparison to males, ASD is underdiagnosed in females, despite higher rates of internalizing symptoms and suicidality. Trauma exposure may also play a role in the development of depressive symptoms in this population. Moreover, evidence for effective treatments of depression in autistic youth are lacking, with ASD individuals frequently experiencing low efficacy and side effects. We present the case of an adolescent female with previously undiagnosed ASD without ID, admitted for active suicidal plans and a treatment-resistant depression (TRD), occurred after a COVID-19 lockdown in the context of cumulative exposure to stressful life events. Comprehensive clinical assessments performed at intake confirmed severe depression with suicidality. Intensive psychotherapy and different changes in medications were carried out (SSRI, SNRI, SNRI + NaSSA, SNRI + aripiprazole), all of which were ineffective, with persistent suicidal thoughts, often requiring intensive individual monitoring. The patient was finally successfully treated with lithium augmentation of fluoxetine, with no side effects. During hospitalization she was also evaluated by an ASD specialized center, where a diagnosis of ASD was made according to the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) and the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) scores, as well as to clinical judgment of a senior psychiatrist. The present case report shows that clinicians should not overlook undiagnosed autism as a possible cause of TRD, especially in females without ID, where higher rates of under diagnosis may be in part related to their greater use of camouflage. It also suggests that ASD underdiagnosis and resulting unmet needs may be involved in vulnerability to stressful experiences, depression, and suicidality. Furthermore, it shows the complexity of providing care to TRD in youth with autism, suggesting that an augmentation therapy with lithium, a commonly recommended therapeutic strategy for refractory depression in typically developing samples, may also be effective in this population.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: By forcing closure of schools, curtailing outpatient services, and imposing strict social distancing, the COVID-19 pandemic has abruptly affected the daily life of millions worldwide, with still unclear consequences for mental health. This study aimed to evaluate if and how child and adolescent psychiatric visits to hospital emergency departments (EDs) changed during the pandemic lockdown, which started in Italy on February 24, 2020. METHODS: We examined all ED visits by patients under 18 years of age in the 7 weeks prior to February 24, 2020, and in the subsequent 8 weeks of COVID-19 lockdown at two urban university hospitals, in Turin and Rome, Italy. ED visits during the corresponding periods of 2019 served as a comparison using Poisson regression modeling. The clinician's decision to hospitalize or discharge home the patient after the ED visit was examined as an index of clinical severity. RESULTS: During the COVID-19 lockdown, there was a 72.0% decrease in the number of all pediatric ED visits (3,395) compared with the corresponding period in 2019 (12,128), with a 46.2% decrease in psychiatric visits (50 vs 93). The mean age of psychiatric patients was higher in the COVID-19 period (15.7 vs 14.1 years). No significant changes were found in hospitalization rate or in the prevalence distribution of the primary reason for the psychiatric ED visit (suicidality, anxiety/mood disorders, agitation). CONCLUSIONS: In the first 8 weeks of the COVID-19-induced social lockdown, the number of child and adolescent psychiatric ED visits significantly decreased, with an increase in patient age. This decrease does not appear to be explained by severity-driven self-selection and might be due to a reduction in psychiatric emergencies or to the implementation of alternative ways of managing acute psychopathology.